Main Menu
Home
Welcome
GunVoter Discussion
Get Involved
Links
Search
Contact Us
News Feeds
Reference
Senators
Representatives
Senate Bills
House Bills
How To Use This Site
A Call To Communicate
Myths About Gun Control
American Hunters and Shooters Assoc.
Related Links
US Code Title 18 Chapter 44 - Firearm Law
US Code Title 26 Chapter 53 - NFA Law
The House
The Senate
The White House
The Declaration of Independence
The Constitution
The Bill of Rights
History
The Sullivan Act (in progress)
National Firearms Act of 1934
Federal Firearms Act of 1938
Gun Control Act of 1968
Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986
The Lautenberg Amendment of 1996
United States vs. Miller (1938)
Senate Report on the Second Amendment (1982)
DOJ Report on the Second Amendment (2004)
FAQ on the Death of the AWB
The Heller Files
Free Wayne

Free Wayne Webring

Home/Join | List | Next | Previous | Random

alt-webring.com


Gun Law News

I present for your consideration Sportsmen for Obama? The next presidential election will be especially important in case the Democrats retain control of the House and Senate.

 
S.2605 - Ammunition Microstamping PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Monday, 11 February 2008

Details

  • Sponsor - Kennedy
  • Proposed - February 7, 2008
  • Congressional Record Link - S.2605
  • Amends - None.
  • Amendments - None.
  • Vote - None yet.
  • Results - No change in law.

Status

February 7, 2008 - Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Synopsis

The bill is relatively short, so here is the entire text:

A BILL
To require certain semiautomatic pistols manufactured, imported, or sold by Federal firearms licensees to be capable of microstamping ammunition.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT THAT CERTAIN SEMIAUTOMATIC PISTOLS MANUFACTURED, IMPORTED, OR SOLD BY FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES BE CAPABLE OF MICROSTAMPING AMMUNITION.
(a) In General- Section 923 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
`(m)(1)(A) A person licensed under this chapter shall not manufacture, import, or transfer a semiautomatic pistol to which this subparagraph applies that is not capable of microstamping ammunition.
`(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), a pistol is capable of microstamping ammunition if--
`(i) a microscopic array of characters that identify the make, model, and serial number of the pistol is etched into the breech face and firing pin of the pistol; and
`(ii) when ammunition is fired from the pistol, the characters are copied from the breech face and firing pin onto the cartridge case of the ammunition.
`(C) Subparagraph (A) shall apply only to semiautomatic pistols which--
`(i) are manufactured, or imported into the United States, on or after the effective date of this subsection; and
`(ii) have not been transferred to a person not licensed under this chapter.
`(2) Whoever violates paragraph (1) shall be fined an amount equal to--
`(A) in the case of a first such violation by the violator, $1,000 multiplied by the number of semiautomatic pistols involved in the violation;
`(B) in the case of a second such violation by the violator, $2,000 multiplied by the number of semiautomatic pistols involved in the violation; or
`(C) in the case of a third such violation by the violator, $3,000 multiplied by the number of semiautomatic pistols involved in the violation.'.
(b) Effective Date- The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2010.

Analysis

Because EVERY gun sold by an FFL after 1/1/10 would need to microstamp, you could call this a short term, gun smith, full employment act.

But back to the basics, according the the definition, every gun would microstamp with the pin and the breech face, neither of which is a gun in legal terms and neither of which is currently serialized.

A simple file would take care of both problems.

Which is just the first problem with this bill. If they really wanted to have microstamping, they would need to:

  1. regulate sales and installation of new parts,
  2. criminalize possession of guns that don't microstamp. But, what about firearms that existed before 1/1/10 that have not changed hands?
  3. consider how to deal with parts where the microstamping just wears out. Not every gun owner is going to keep a microscope around to see if the stamping is still legible.
I suggest we start by requiring all Kennedy family body guards have microstamping firearms to see if the technology is practical and useful.

Comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 
< Prev   Next >




About Us |  Copyright 2004-2008, Gun Law News
Do not construe anything you read here to be legal advice.
Consult your attorney for any advice you may require.



Visitor Map

 

Alert
Subscribe






Support GLN

 The History Channel

Also

John Adams

DVDs for sale

Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Current Initiatives
Popular
Most Rated Content
Polls Archive
September - Would You Support Repeal of the Brady Bill?…
October - What Should We Go For Next…
Would You Support Repeal of Lautenberg?…
Are you a one-issue voter?…
Let's relax. How many guns do you own?…
Blog Roll
A Keyboard and a .45
Alphecca
Another Gun Blog
An Ol' Broad's Ramblings
Bitch Girls
Bloggo the Dog Boy
Blue Grass, Red State
Call me Ahab
Captain of a Crew of One
carnaby fudge
Chicago Handgun Rights
ConservaChick
Cowboy Bob
Crime, Guns and Video Tape
Damnum Absque Injuria
Dave Kopel
Days of Our Trailers
Elendil's Journal
Freedom Sight
Front Sight Press
Fun Turns to Tragedy!!!
Geek with a .45
John Lott
massBackwards
Michael Bane
Mr. Completely
No Quarters
Of Arms & the Law
Pointman's Page
Resistance is futile!
Say Uncle
The Smallest Minority
Texican Tattler
Triggerfinger
The View From North Central Idaho
View From The Porch
The War on Guns
Xavier Thoughts