Main Menu
Home
GunVoter Discussion
Welcome
Get Involved
Links
Search
Contact Us
News Feeds
Reference
Senators
Representatives
Senate Bills
House Bills
How To Use This Site
A Call To Communicate
Myths About Gun Control
American Hunters and Shooters Assoc.
Related Links
US Code Title 18 Chapter 44 - Firearm Law
US Code Title 26 Chapter 53 - NFA Law
The House
The Senate
The White House
The Declaration of Independence
The Constitution
The Bill of Rights
History
The Sullivan Act (in progress)
National Firearms Act of 1934
Federal Firearms Act of 1938
Gun Control Act of 1968
Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986
The Lautenberg Amendment of 1996
United States vs. Miller (1938)
Senate Report on the Second Amendment (1982)
DOJ Report on the Second Amendment (2004)
FAQ on the Death of the AWB
The Heller Files
Syndicate
Free Wayne

Free Wayne Webring

Home/Join | List | Next | Previous | Random

alt-webring.com


Gun Law News

I present for your consideration Sportsmen for Obama? The next presidential election will be especially important in case the Democrats retain control of the House and Senate.

 
Still Looking for Lautenberg Victims PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 6
PoorBest 
Thursday, 15 December 2005

We have a few responses, but not nearly as many as we need. Before we approach the NRA and the GOA, I want to have an overwhelming number of first person stories of how Lautenberg has unjustly denied people their Second Amendment rights. If you have such a story, go to this forum entry and give us a sketch of your story. If you know somebody with such a story, please send them over.

If you don't know what a Lautenberg Victim is, check out The only way to win..... That poor soul is a Lautenberg Victim in the making.

Comments
1-31-06 Lautenberg Sentence - 3yrs Proba
Written by cketchum on 2006-02-10 12:37:55
Hello again!  
Many thanks for your thoughts and prayers. I got 3 yrs probation with early termination in one year. It could have been much worse... 37-48 months in prison for the number of guns in my collection.  
 
What was amazing was that the US Attorney with the ATF&E agent at his side was actually defending me rather than prosecuting! In 50 years of standing before Federal Court, my attorney (Walter Gerash) had never seen anything like it. Everyone in the courtroom seemed to be on my side.  
God was certainly looking down on me that day!  
 
After sentencing the investigating officer of the Colorado Jefferson County Joint Anti-Terrorism Task Force told me I could (have a friend) strip the weapons before destruction! That means I can recoup perhaps $10K in optics, mounts, bolt and trigger groups, bipods, stocks, barrels, grips, cylinders, magazines, etc.  
 
It is a damn shame as they are all quite valuable and beautiful firearms, one a family heirloom... 1878 S&W Schofield .45 that belonged to Col. William F. Chapman, 2nd in command to Col. Moseby during the Civil War.  
 
It seems some in our judicial system and some in LE understand Lautenberg is unjust. But one can only pray that it will be repealed... I've waited 13 years to no avail.  
 
Now it's down the pardon path (3 years after probation), both for the original misdemeanor and the felony. Where is Bill Clinton when I need him? Just kidding - I'd rather give up my rights than see him or Hillary in office again!  
 
**** This is what I now include with any employment application, and even that may not help. Nowadays background checks are the norm or at least the box you must check "Have you have ever been convicted."  
 
 
Re: Static (Victimless) offense  
 
Hello,  
I only ask that you read this letter before passing judgment. The people that know me know of my honesty, integrity, lawfulness and professionalism. I was sentenced to probation for a felony on 31 January 2006: Possession of a Ruger .22 caliber target rifle by a prohibited person.  
 
In 1993 I accepted a misdemeanor charge involving the discipline of my rebellious, runaway, teenaged son rather than to drag him through a jury trial for something my attorney assured me would not have any impact on my ability to own a firearm.  
 
In 1996, the infamous Lautenberg Amendment became law. Simply stated: Anyone found guilty of domestic violence, (ever in their life) automatically loses their 2nd amendment rights. As a layman, this change in the law did not seem fair. I believed it was simply a matter of time before Congress or the courts would repeal this unjust, unconstitutional, ex-post facto law which infringes upon our 2nd Amendment right.  
 
I grew up hunting and shooting with my father and brothers. I have been a safe, responsible and law abiding gun owner all my life. I have never used a firearm for anything other than collecting, target shooting or hunting. I could not, or maybe more accurately would not, understand the connection between my offense in 1993 and my ability to own a gun  
 
In 2000, I injured my hand while making fireworks in my garage. The County Sheriff subsequently searched my residence and discovered a family gun collection. The fact that I did not think the law was fair or that it should not apply to me, did not give me any right to disobey the law.  
 
Unfortunately, the fact that I could not let go of this collection when I should have has cost me dearly. As a result, I am now branded a felon. I ask that you see past this disability and give me the opportunity for employment in my field of expertise.  
Respectfully,  
OIF/OEF veteran with lautenberg
Written by army_dad101 on 2006-02-24 06:35:12
Hello i am new here so hopefully this is what you are looking for in 2001 i was charged with a DV i pled not guilty becuase it did not happen my ex-wife even stated that the reason she filed it is because she had a boyfriend that she wanted to move in and didnt know how to tell me nice huh. anyways i pled not guilty and it was thrown out of court for insufficient evidence. in 2003 my iowa national guard unit got activated to go to iraq i was stationed in iraq as a humvee gunner providing convoy security and doing patrols and also recieved numerous citations and awards i returned home to the states in jan of 04 in feb 04 i applied to the local police department for a job they were unable to hire me due to a charge of DV and according to them a conviction of the same in 2001 so i ask if this charge was there the whole time how was it our wonderful government sent me into combat when i cannot carry a firearm civilian wise i do not understand this and now the military is tring to kick me out instead of help me get this straightened out.

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 
< Prev   Next >




About Us |  Copyright 2004-2008, Gun Law News
Do not construe anything you read here to be legal advice.
Consult your attorney for any advice you may require.



Visitor Map

 

Alert
Subscribe






Support GLN

 

The World At War:

Collector's Edition DVD set

 

Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Current Initiatives
Popular
Most Rated Content
Polls Archive
September - Would You Support Repeal of the Brady Bill?…
October - What Should We Go For Next…
Would You Support Repeal of Lautenberg?…
Are you a one-issue voter?…
Let's relax. How many guns do you own?…
Blog Roll
A Keyboard and a .45
Alphecca
Another Gun Blog
An Ol' Broad's Ramblings
Bitch Girls
Bloggo the Dog Boy
Blue Grass, Red State
Call me Ahab
Captain of a Crew of One
carnaby fudge
Chicago Handgun Rights
ConservaChick
Cowboy Bob
Crime, Guns and Video Tape
Damnum Absque Injuria
Dave Kopel
Days of Our Trailers
Elendil's Journal
Freedom Sight
Front Sight Press
Fun Turns to Tragedy!!!
Geek with a .45
John Lott
massBackwards
Michael Bane
Mr. Completely
No Quarters
Of Arms & the Law
Pointman's Page
Resistance is futile!
Say Uncle
The Smallest Minority
Texican Tattler
Triggerfinger
The View From North Central Idaho
View From The Porch
The War on Guns
Xavier Thoughts