Obviously the site is going through a major revision. The current legislation has been brought over, but historical legislation is going to take alittle time. Some links will be broken until the conversion is complete, but to be honest, maintaining two sites was taking it toll.

Please be patient.

Some forum entries were lost when we got hacked earlier in the month. Hopefully the software upgrade will resolve that issue.

For you bloggers, we try to include a 'Read More...' button to give a direct link to an article. There may be more behind the button or just a '--The End--' to force the button's availability.

Shoot a note to if there is some page that you would like expedited or just to let us know what you think.

Thanks.

Gun grabbers point to restrictions on the First Amendment as proof that restrictions to the Second can be Constitutionally acceptable. Sit down and drop whatever is in your hands. Take a deep breath. I agree with them.

The example is always "You can't yell fire in a movie theater". They are wrong. You can if there is a fire. Just the same, you shouldn't discharge your firearm in a movie theater unless there is a credible and sufficient threat and you won't hit any innocents.

We have never copied a piece lock, stock and barrel. But this one is significant to receive such treatment:

By confiscating the guns of lawful gun owners, the police forces in New Orleans have effectively suspended a part of the Constitution. Their excuse is that they have the right to do their job without fear of being shot at and as the situation may get worse, law abiding citizens may turn to lawlessness to survive.

So, is this a legal action? Is a civic emergency grounds to suspend Constitution rights?