Main Menu
Home
Welcome
GunVoter Discussion
Get Involved
Links
Search
Contact Us
News Feeds
Reference
Senators
Representatives
Senate Bills
House Bills
How To Use This Site
A Call To Communicate
Myths About Gun Control
American Hunters and Shooters Assoc.
Related Links
US Code Title 18 Chapter 44 - Firearm Law
US Code Title 26 Chapter 53 - NFA Law
The House
The Senate
The White House
The Declaration of Independence
The Constitution
The Bill of Rights
History
The Sullivan Act (in progress)
National Firearms Act of 1934
Federal Firearms Act of 1938
Gun Control Act of 1968
Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986
The Lautenberg Amendment of 1996
United States vs. Miller (1938)
Senate Report on the Second Amendment (1982)
DOJ Report on the Second Amendment (2004)
FAQ on the Death of the AWB
The Heller Files
Syndicate
Free Wayne

Free Wayne Webring

Home/Join | List | Next | Previous | Random

alt-webring.com


Gun Law News

I present for your consideration Sportsmen for Obama? The next presidential election will be especially important in case the Democrats retain control of the House and Senate.

 
H.R.5005 - Firearms Correction and Improvements Act PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 3
PoorBest 
Tuesday, 28 March 2006

Details

  • Sponsor - Smith of Texas
  • Proposed - March 16, 2006
  • Congressional Record Link - HR5005
  • Amends - None.
  • Amendments - None.
  • Vote - None yet.
  • Results - No change in law.

Status

March 16, 2006 - Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

March 23, 2006 - Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

March 28, 2006 - Judiciary Committee hearing on H.R.5005.

May 11, 2006 - Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

May 18, 2006 - Passed back to the full Judiciary Committee without amendment.

July 26, 2006 - Judiciary Committee hearing scheduled. No work done.

September 7, 2006 - The Judiciary Committee held a markup session which may have amended H.R.5005 with a Lautenberg Amendment like section relating to sex offenders involving juveniles.

September 13, 2006 - The bill was passed out of the Judicary Committee by a vote of 21-11. We are still trying to find out what the amendments are. There are now 131 cosponsors.

Synopsis

In the short term, the bill allows the importation of ANY firearm parts (including barrels, frames and recievers) so long as they will be used for repair or replacement. This includes firearm parts for firearms that are no longer importable.

Most of the remainder of the bill makes permanent situations that had been enacted in appropriations bills in previous years. Those situations include:

  • a ban on taxes or 'user fees' for the NICS system.
  • a ban on the creation of a federal, computerized index of dealer's 4473's.
  • limits on trace records disclosures

Beyond all that, there are some provisions for manufacturers and government contractors and the repeal of the Youth Handgun Safety Act.

Rep. Smith's office provided their summary of H.R.5005: hr5005.pdf.

Analysis

There is no question that this bill is not earth shattering. But, making law permanant that has been passed for years in appropriations bills is a good thing. In future years, gun control advocates would need to change the laws instead of just changing appropriations bills they are already working on.

Section 3 allows government contractors (individuals) working in secuirty to purchase post-86 machine guns.

Gun Law News understands this provision, but we disagree with it. The Hughes Amendment to FOPA86 is the first outright ban on any gun in US law. Instead of including Sec. 3, the Hughes Amendment should be repealed.

'SEC. 10. BARREL AND RECEIVER IMPORTATION' forces the BATFE to allow importation of firearm parts they currently disallow. The BATFE would no longer be able to decide unilaterally that would not allow importation of certain parts.

Any amendment related to sex offenders becoming prohibited persons is seen with grave concern. Any offense justifying the loss of rights should have justitfied greater than one year in jail and the person would already be prohibited.

Comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 
< Prev   Next >




About Us |  Copyright 2004-2008, Gun Law News
Do not construe anything you read here to be legal advice.
Consult your attorney for any advice you may require.



Visitor Map

 

Alert
Subscribe






Support GLN

 The History Channel

Also

John Adams

DVDs for sale

Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Current Initiatives
Popular
Most Rated Content
Polls Archive
September - Would You Support Repeal of the Brady Bill?…
October - What Should We Go For Next…
Would You Support Repeal of Lautenberg?…
Are you a one-issue voter?…
Let's relax. How many guns do you own?…
Blog Roll
A Keyboard and a .45
Alphecca
Another Gun Blog
An Ol' Broad's Ramblings
Bitch Girls
Bloggo the Dog Boy
Blue Grass, Red State
Call me Ahab
Captain of a Crew of One
carnaby fudge
Chicago Handgun Rights
ConservaChick
Cowboy Bob
Crime, Guns and Video Tape
Damnum Absque Injuria
Dave Kopel
Days of Our Trailers
Elendil's Journal
Freedom Sight
Front Sight Press
Fun Turns to Tragedy!!!
Geek with a .45
John Lott
massBackwards
Michael Bane
Mr. Completely
No Quarters
Of Arms & the Law
Pointman's Page
Resistance is futile!
Say Uncle
The Smallest Minority
Texican Tattler
Triggerfinger
The View From North Central Idaho
View From The Porch
The War on Guns
Xavier Thoughts