|
Dec. 18 - Today in the News |
|
|
|
|
Monday, 19 December 2005 |
- Philadelphia Police Commissioner Sylvester Johnson is either ignorant, or he speaks with forked tongue.
"We have the most lax handgun law in the entire nation," Johnson said. He should consider educating himself about Vermont or Alaska before he opens his mouth. Check out his "it's not my fault" article at Philadelphia not alone in its struggle with rising murder rate. - Once again: Democrats recast gun control image. I guess this is 'everybody do what Kerry tried to do!" like lemmings off a cliff. They don't get that they don't convince people and only come across as liars. Should make for some real fun.
- And in Chicago, the retired cops are not happy that they don't get to carry concealed weapons:
Everybody gets guns but us
Let me get this right: I was a Chicago Police officer who retired as a detective after 32 years of service to the city. Congress passed a law in 2004 that gives retired officers throughout the United States the right to carry concealed weapons. Gov. Blagojevich signs legislation in July 2005 saying retired police officers in Illinois can carry concealed weapons. But Mayor Daley, who has a security detail of 30 active Chicago Police officers protecting him and his family 24 hours a day, refuses to let me carry a weapon.
The gang-bangers who prowl my neighborhood can carry a weapon, an alderman can carry a concealed weapon, a retired police officer from any place other than Chicago who visits or lives here can carry a weapon, but I am not qualified to carry a weapon?
Al Barski,
Lower West Side
from: http://www.suntimes.com/output/letters/cst-edt-vox16a.html
In Chicago there are sheep and there are wolves. I guess Al doesn't like being told he is a sheep, like the rest of the Chicago victims. How about concealed carry for everyone? The criminals already have it. - Finally, the funniest pointer of the day. Question: if you had a legal question, would you go to a lawyer or a high school teacher? Now stop laughing. The teacher believes she is
write er right. Check out Second Amendment commentary shot balance in the foot. The writer doesn't address her real believe in the collective theory of the Second Amendment, just that the paper only presented one side and it wasn't her side.
Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment 2.0! |
