Main Menu
Home
Welcome
GunVoter Discussion
Get Involved
Links
Search
Contact Us
News Feeds
Reference
Senators
Representatives
Senate Bills
House Bills
How To Use This Site
A Call To Communicate
Myths About Gun Control
American Hunters and Shooters Assoc.
Related Links
US Code Title 18 Chapter 44 - Firearm Law
US Code Title 26 Chapter 53 - NFA Law
The House
The Senate
The White House
The Declaration of Independence
The Constitution
The Bill of Rights
History
The Sullivan Act (in progress)
National Firearms Act of 1934
Federal Firearms Act of 1938
Gun Control Act of 1968
Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986
The Lautenberg Amendment of 1996
United States vs. Miller (1938)
Senate Report on the Second Amendment (1982)
DOJ Report on the Second Amendment (2004)
FAQ on the Death of the AWB
The Heller Files
Free Wayne

Free Wayne Webring

Home/Join | List | Next | Previous | Random

alt-webring.com


Gun Law News

I present for your consideration Sportsmen for Obama? The next presidential election will be especially important in case the Democrats retain control of the House and Senate.

 
Bitter Responds About Kansas PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Thursday, 10 May 2007

Bitter dresses me down, not in a good way: 

While it's still important to get more information about what the process will be to return guns, there's no need to announce the news out of Kansas as a big threat.
A town was wiped off the face of the earth.  All but a handful of buildings were completely knocked down and destroyed.  Unlike Katrina, homes weren't left standing and cops haven't gone door-to-door taking guns out of cabinets and safes.
In the context of the type of damage a tornado does, all the latest reports from Kansas indicate that clean up crews are merely picking up guns they find in the debris, tagging them and turning them over for safe storage with full intent to return them to owners.  One person from the area who called into NRA News Tuesday night noted that he was under the impression that authorities are even noting where they found them in case it belongs to that address or one nearby and they can make the return process easier.
Obviously, getting the guns back to their rightful owners will be a process that they could use to cause problems.  However, nothing in the NRA alert or any other reports that I've seen in the blogosphere or elsewhere indicates that they intend to cause problems for the owners.  NRA merely wants people to know that if they've heard rumors, so has the organization and they are checking it out.  They also want to keep an eye on it, though there's no obvious signs of it being any kind of problem.
I hope you'll do your part to frame the news from Kansas in the full scope of the events and not contribute to alarm and panic that's simply not based on facts at this time.
As a gun owner who grew up in tornado alley with witness to exactly what damage these storms can do, I know I would actually appreciate the authorities rounding up any of my guns that were blown away along with the rest of my house.  Having guns - some possibly loaded - resting in the debris and on the streets where they are trying to focus on recovery could possibly be a dangerous situation.  Not to mention, leaving your gun out in the open elements is not exactly in the best interest of keeping it in good condition.  It all seems kosher and like appropriate measures.
I admit, it would be more reassuring if the local recovery crews did some kind of press conference announcing exactly what their plans are in returning any found guns to their owners.  However, please keep in mind that this town is gone.  Every family lost a home.  And as someone from a town as small as Greensburg, if 10 people suddenly died in one night, it would add to the trauma of every resident.
Your post seemed a bit on the alarming side and I would hope that you consider posting a note that gives the full context in order to keep people from being alarmed.  If you have more information that I don't that indicates the guns are being taken in more of a Katrina-style manner, please feel free to share.

Update: Just to be clear, I think Bitter is right. My time is in such short supply, I didn't investigate / explain enough. Thanks to Bitter for taking the time.

Comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 
< Prev   Next >




About Us |  Copyright 2004-2008, Gun Law News
Do not construe anything you read here to be legal advice.
Consult your attorney for any advice you may require.



Visitor Map

 

Alert
Subscribe






Support GLN

 

The World At War:

Collector's Edition DVD set

 

Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Current Initiatives
Popular
Most Rated Content
Polls Archive
September - Would You Support Repeal of the Brady Bill?…
October - What Should We Go For Next…
Would You Support Repeal of Lautenberg?…
Are you a one-issue voter?…
Let's relax. How many guns do you own?…
Blog Roll
A Keyboard and a .45
Alphecca
Another Gun Blog
An Ol' Broad's Ramblings
Bitch Girls
Bloggo the Dog Boy
Blue Grass, Red State
Call me Ahab
Captain of a Crew of One
carnaby fudge
Chicago Handgun Rights
ConservaChick
Cowboy Bob
Crime, Guns and Video Tape
Damnum Absque Injuria
Dave Kopel
Days of Our Trailers
Elendil's Journal
Freedom Sight
Front Sight Press
Fun Turns to Tragedy!!!
Geek with a .45
John Lott
massBackwards
Michael Bane
Mr. Completely
No Quarters
Of Arms & the Law
Pointman's Page
Resistance is futile!
Say Uncle
The Smallest Minority
Texican Tattler
Triggerfinger
The View From North Central Idaho
View From The Porch
The War on Guns
Xavier Thoughts