|
SA1625 - Negligent Dealer Exemption for S.397 |
|
|
|
|
Friday, 09 September 2005 |
Details- Sponsor - Warner
- Proposed - July 27, 2005
- Congressional Record Link - SB1625
- Amends - SB397
- Amendments - None.
- Vote - Amendment did not reach Senate floor.
- Results - No change in law.
SynopsisThe entire text of the amendment is:
On page 8, line 21, before the semicolon, insert the following: ``or an action against a seller that has an established history of qualified products being lost or stolen, under such criteria as shall be established by the Attorney General by regulation, for an injury or death caused by a qualified product that was in the possession of the seller, but subsequently lost or stolen''.
AnalysisWith this, the Attorney General would be given the power to determine what would constitute a negligent dealer. Once again our Second Amendment rights our in the hands of a political appointee and the winds of change over time can redefine what is negligent.
One more time we will say: "Constitution rights never belong in the hands of a political appointee for interpretation. Never."
Only registered users can write comments. Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment 2.0! |