Main Menu
Home
Welcome
GunVoter Discussion
Get Involved
Links
Search
Contact Us
News Feeds
Reference
Senators
Representatives
Senate Bills
House Bills
How To Use This Site
A Call To Communicate
Myths About Gun Control
American Hunters and Shooters Assoc.
Related Links
US Code Title 18 Chapter 44 - Firearm Law
US Code Title 26 Chapter 53 - NFA Law
The House
The Senate
The White House
The Declaration of Independence
The Constitution
The Bill of Rights
History
The Sullivan Act (in progress)
National Firearms Act of 1934
Federal Firearms Act of 1938
Gun Control Act of 1968
Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986
The Lautenberg Amendment of 1996
United States vs. Miller (1938)
Senate Report on the Second Amendment (1982)
DOJ Report on the Second Amendment (2004)
FAQ on the Death of the AWB
The Heller Files
Congressional Report on D.C. v. Heller
Free Wayne

Free Wayne Webring

Home/Join | List | Next | Previous | Random

alt-webring.com


Gun Law News

I present for your consideration Sportsmen for Clinton? and Sportsmen for Obama? The next presidential election will be especially important in case the Democrats retain control of the House and Senate.

 
SA1626 - Child Safety Lock Act of 2005 PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Friday, 09 September 2005

Details

  • Sponsor - Kohl
  • Proposed - July 27, 2005
  • Congressional Record Link - SA1626
  • Amends - S.397
  • Amendments - None.
  • Vote - 2005-207 - July 28, 2005, 70-30 Amendment passed.
  • Results - October 26, 2005- Signed by the President and became Public Law No: 109-92 as a part of S.397.

Synopsis

This bill is a trigger lock law. It requires that a trigger lock be provided with every handgun transfer. This law does not apply to private firearm sales.

The law also provides for immunity from liability for those that use "secure gun storage or safety device with the handgun". See the text of the amendment for details.

Analysis

Different gun owners are in different situations. Some have small children and an available, loaded firearm would be a mistake. Others do not have children as residents or visitors to their home.

Responsible gun owners assess their needs and take care of their requirements without the need for legislation.

Irresponsible gun owners will not change their behavior by requiring the purchase of a trigger lock.

This bill will only serve to increase the total cost of firearms to the public.

On a personal note, I used to own a trigger lock. It was a waste of money. Safes are a better alternative for my situation. If the day comes that I am required to buy one, I will immediately attempt to resell it back to the gun shop. If that is unsuccessful, it will end up in a yard sale unopened.

Comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 
< Prev   Next >




About Us |  Copyright 2004-2008, Gun Law News
Do not construe anything you read here to be legal advice.
Consult your attorney for any advice you may require.



Visitor Map

 

Alert
Subscribe






Support GLN

 The History Channel

Also

John Adams

DVDs for sale

Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Current Initiatives
Popular
Most Rated Content
Polls Archive
September - Would You Support Repeal of the Brady Bill?…
October - What Should We Go For Next…
Would You Support Repeal of Lautenberg?…
Are you a one-issue voter?…
Let's relax. How many guns do you own?…
Blog Roll
Alphecca
Armed Passengers Project
Cam Edwards
carnaby fudge
Cowboy Bob
Crime, Guns and Video Tape
Damnum Absque Injuria
Dave Kopel
Florida Gun Lawyer
Freedom Sight
Front Sight Press
Fun Turns to Tragedy!!!
Geek with a .45
John Lott
Libercontrarian
massBackwards
Mr. Completely
No Quarters
Of Arms & the Law
one in a row
Pointman's Page
Publicola
reasonablenut
Resistance is futile!
Say Uncle
The 2nd Amendment Carnival
The Smallest Minority
Texican Tattler
Triggerfinger
The View From North Central Idaho
View From The Porch
The War on Guns
Xavier Thoughts