Main Menu
Home
GunVoter Discussion
Welcome
Get Involved
Links
Search
Contact Us
News Feeds
Reference
Senators
Representatives
Senate Bills
House Bills
How To Use This Site
A Call To Communicate
Myths About Gun Control
American Hunters and Shooters Assoc.
Related Links
US Code Title 18 Chapter 44 - Firearm Law
US Code Title 26 Chapter 53 - NFA Law
The House
The Senate
The White House
The Declaration of Independence
The Constitution
The Bill of Rights
History
The Sullivan Act (in progress)
National Firearms Act of 1934
Federal Firearms Act of 1938
Gun Control Act of 1968
Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986
The Lautenberg Amendment of 1996
United States vs. Miller (1938)
Senate Report on the Second Amendment (1982)
DOJ Report on the Second Amendment (2004)
FAQ on the Death of the AWB
The Heller Files
Free Wayne

Free Wayne Webring

Home/Join | List | Next | Previous | Random

alt-webring.com


Gun Law News

 
SA1645 - Craig Alternative to SA1615 PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Friday, 09 September 2005

Details

  • Sponsor - Craig
  • Proposed - July 29, 2005
  • Congressional Record Link - SA1645
  • Amends - S.397
  • Amendments - None.
  • Vote - 2005-216 - July 29, 2005, 87-11 Passed.
  • Results - No change in law.

Synopsis

SA1645 only does the following:

  • The first part simply restates current law: 18 USC 922(a)7 and 8.
  • The second part of the amendment increases federal penalties for using this ammunition in the commission of a crime.
  • The third and last part of the amendment requires the AG to conduct a study and issue a report but does not create any new powers that the AG does not already have.
At this point in time, the only power the AG currently has is to declare ammunition as not ‘armor piercing’ because of sporting purposes or industrial purposes as specified in 18 USC 921(a)17.

Analysis

The worst thing this amendment will do is spend tax payer money. Wording will be selectively chosen by Kennedy to show that Congress should pass one of his 'armor piercing bullet' bans. And that is all.

Comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 
< Prev   Next >




About Us |  Copyright 2004-2009, Gun Law News
Do not construe anything you read here to be legal advice.
Consult your attorney for any advice you may require.



Visitor Map

 

Alert
Subscribe






Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Current Initiatives
Popular
Most Rated Content
Polls Archive
September - Would You Support Repeal of the Brady Bill?…
October - What Should We Go For Next…
Would You Support Repeal of Lautenberg?…
Are you a one-issue voter?…
Let's relax. How many guns do you own?…
Blog Roll
A Keyboard and a .45
Alphecca
Another Gun Blog
An Ol' Broad's Ramblings
Bitch Girls
Bloggo the Dog Boy
Blue Grass, Red State
Call me Ahab
Captain of a Crew of One
carnaby fudge
Chicago Handgun Rights
ConservaChick
Cowboy Bob
Crime, Guns and Video Tape
Damnum Absque Injuria
Dave Kopel
Days of Our Trailers
Elendil's Journal
Freedom Sight
Front Sight Press
Fun Turns to Tragedy!!!
Geek with a .45
John Lott
massBackwards
Michael Bane
Mr. Completely
No Quarters
Of Arms & the Law
Pointman's Page
Resistance is futile!
Say Uncle
The Smallest Minority
Texican Tattler
Triggerfinger
The View From North Central Idaho
View From The Porch
The War on Guns
Xavier Thoughts